Vermonters Go To War
By Helen Simon-Franzak
Photos by Margaret Michniewicz
Although
Iraq is thousands of miles from the Green Mountain State, for some Vermonters
the war there is as close as an empty spot in the marriage bed or a grave
in the local cemetery.
The Iraqi conflict has taken the lives of six men with ties to Vermont.
Altogether, about 500 members of the American armed forces have been killed;
more than 20 have taken their own lives. The war in Iraq has polarized
the nation and become a major issue in the presidential campaign.
For one Vermont family, the conflict has meant the loss of an only son
and the grandchildren who will never be born; in another, it has left
a first-born child celebrating his first Christmas and first tooth with
Daddy risking his life to promote democracy in a faraway land.
On the flip side, some members of the armed forces view assignments in
Iraq as a chance to use skills they have worked hard to hone and an opportunity
to contribute to a cause they consider much greater than themselves.
Friends, Cellphones, & Babies
Mindy Evnin of South Burlington says her life and daily routine haven’t
changed much since her son, Marine Cpl. Mark Evnin, 21, was killed April
3, 2003, after a firefight near the Iraqi city of Kut. It’s how
she feels that’s different.
"I have this huge hole in my life," she says. "How I feel
is hugely changed."
One good thing that has come out of Mark’s death is the many wonderful
people who have contacted her from around the country and the world. Some
Jewish war veterans in Florida even named their chapter after Mark.
"It makes me feel comforted that people care and that a lot of people
are not forgetting," she says. "… For a moment it feels
better."
Still, her life continues to be an emotional rollercoaster. Sometimes
she feels fine and is laughing; other times she’s so low she doesn’t
know how she’s going to cope.
The hardest part of losing her son, she says, is not seeing what kind
of person he would have grown to be and what kind of father he would have
become.
"For anybody losing a kid, it’s the worst," she says.
Jessica Cross, 21, of Milton has her cell phone beside her day and night
in case her husband, Army Sgt. Paul Cross, has a break in his busy Baghdad
schedule to call her. She speaks to Paul once a week for about 20 minutes.
The war has kept the couple’s life in limbo. Paul, 25, a sniper
guarding high-ranking officers, was supposed to leave Iraq this February
but his assignment was extended. He won’t be home until September.
Cross hesitated to buy a car, set up daycare for their 8-month-old son
Brennan, and get a job in case Paul was sent home. In the meantime, she
has spent the $12,000 nest egg the couple built up for her to stay home
with the baby.
Cross says she misses sitting up with Paul at night talking, the intimacy,
having him there to help her make decisions about their lives.
"It’s so hard," she says. "It’s awful."
Her husband’s morale and that of his colleagues is very low, she
says. To hear Paul, "the leader of our family, say ‘I might
die out here’" is very upsetting, she says, her voice cracking.
She worries how the couple’s marriage will be affected by the horrible
things he has seen in the war and his long time away, about his mental
and physical health, about opening the door to soldiers bringing news
of his death.
She also worries about their son being without his father for the early
part of his life — having Paul miss Brennan’s first Christmas,
his first tooth, his first steps. She feels guilty about tickling the
baby to make him laugh when he’s on the phone with Paul.
"I feel awful because Brennan is kind of looking like, ‘Who
is that?’" she says. "But I think just for Paul to hear
Brennan laugh is important."
Hard for Everyone
Major General Martha Rainville, head of the Vermont National Guard, says
mobilization overseas interrupts members’ education, their jobs,
and their normal lives with their families.
"It has been difficult for some," she says.
Some families end up with a cut in income if the wage earner leaves a
high-paying position for deployment in a lesser-paying one, she says.
Deployment can also place a strain on employers — particularly small
businesses — who must guarantee the same or equivalent jobs for
returning armed-forces members. At least one couple liquidated a family
business after deciding it would be too hard for the wife to run it alone
when her husband went to Afghanistan.
Rainville says the days are gone when people joining the Guard don’t
have to worry about ever going abroad. Now it’s almost a given.
While some Guard members near retirement are weighing whether to leave
as soon as they are eligible, Rainville says morale in the National Guard
is high overall.
"People are volunteering to be deployed," she says, "because
they see it as something positive, something worthwhile."
Vermont Guard at-a-Glance
About 300 members of the Vermont National Guard have been deployed overseas.
The last group left Vermont January 23, 2004, for assignments related
to Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Another 300 Vermont Guard members will be mobilized this summer for peacekeeping
missions under the European command.
The Vermont National Guard is comprised of almost 4,000 members —
about 3,000 in the Army National Guard and 1,000 in the Air National Guard.
Source: Vermont National Guard
|
Major Medical Woman
Trains Troops in Afghanistan
Major Anne Young of the Vermont Army National Guard says she learned
a few lessons from her recent assignment training medical personnel for
the Afghan National Army (ANA).
"One thing it definitely reinforces is cultural tolerance,"
she says of her almost seven months in Kabul. "Everybody has so much
to learn from each other — us from them and them from us."
And, she adds, "It makes you appreciate what we have in this country
— the freedoms, the way of life we just take for granted."
Young, 48, a resident of Barre, is a full-time occupational health nurse
with the Guard. Her job is to ensure that the tasks her fellow Guard members
do are safe.
She volunteered to go to Afghanistan when her husband Michael was called
up to help establish a company of military police within the Afghan National
Army. She arrived in Afghanistan June 7, 2003, and returned to Vermont
December 31.
In Kabul, Young was the officer in charge of a group assigned to revamp
a training program for ANA medics and to help the ANA take over the running
of its medical clinic.
Young was one of about a dozen female armed-forces members working at
the ANA’s Kabul Military Training Center. Going in, she says, her
biggest concern was whether being female would present problems. The Afghan
general in charge of the training center said it would not, and he was
right.
"It never was an issue," she says.
At the training center she worked amid some 1,800 Afghan male soldiers
without incident. The ANA medical personnel she collaborated with were
very receptive and eager to learn, she says.
In Kabul, military security was tight. There were ID checks and mirror
searches under the vehicles of everyone entering Camp Phoenix —
where Young and her husband lived along with as many as 1,000 foreign
troops — and the Kabul Military Training Center, about 10 minutes
away.
On the street, Young always kept her wits about her and wore her uniform,
protective vest, and 9mm pistol. She smiled a lot and said hello in the
local language.
"There’s always the potential [for danger]," she says.
"We were very, very lucky. There were no incidents with us."
The biggest threat turned out to be the Afghan roadways, where drivers
have no age or licensing requirements, there are no rules, and cars jockey
with tanks, donkey carts, trucks, and pedestrians for access to the travel
lanes.
Young is proud of what she and the five medics assigned to her were able
to accomplish. When they got there, there were only six well-trained medics
at the Kabul Military Training Center. Her group trained about 180. And
when they left, the first 36 medics had just graduated from training run
entirely by the ANA.
Young says both she and her husband are glad they had the chance to go
to Afghanistan.
"We would do it again," she says.
Demands on Military Reignite Draft Discussions
Discussion about reviving a military draft continues in the wake of the
U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and commitments of American troops to
multiple conflicts abroad.
At present, there does not appear to be much support for such a measure
in Congress or among the U.S. armed forces, observers say. Still, the
possibility of having the draft reinstated is on the minds of at least
some Vermont parents and members of the military.
Jane Kanfer of Williston, a teacher and mother of a 21-year-old son and
a 19-year-old daughter, remembers the draft and young men’s fears
of being called up during the Vietnam war.
"Kids were scared," she says. "I knew kids that died in
my town and we thought it was horrifying."
Kanfer strongly opposes a draft. "To me drafting always felt kind
of like slavery," she says.
Instead, she favors improving conditions for members of the voluntary
armed forces and resolving conflicts with diplomacy instead of with force.
Kanfer would support her son’s decision to avoid military service
if involuntary recruitment were reinstated, she says. "I would help
him pack his bags for Canada."
Better Support for Volunteer Army
Major General Martha Rainville, head of the Vermont National Guard, does
not support reviving the draft, but says, "It’s not a bad discussion
to have."
Rainville says the voluntary system has worked "very well."
The quality and motivation of volunteers has been high and many are committed
to continuing their education.
With a draft, she says, many resources would be spent on disciplinary
measures for those who didn’t want to be there, taking away from
efforts to improve the overall force.
"I think there are a lot of negatives with having to rely on a draft,"
Rainville says.
An alternative, she says, is to improve conditions for the voluntary
recruits — with modern equipment, better health benefits for themselves
and their families, up-to-date technology; and by keeping promises to
take care of them when unexpected hazards arise, such as Agent Orange
and Gulf War Syndrome.
Also, efforts should be made to reach out to populations traditionally
ignored by recruiting campaigns — particularly women, she says.
Rainville says National Guard recruitments have been up since the end
of the war in Iraq last spring and she doesn’t expect a change in
the trend.
"They feel the mission is important," she says of new applicants.
Army recruitments at the Armed Forces Career Center in Burlington have
been stable in the past several years, says Sargent First Class Lange,
who does not use his first name in his job.
"It’s business as usual for us as recruiters," he says,
adding that he has no opinion on selective service.
Not Business as Usual
During most of its history, the United States has not had a military
draft, opting instead for a small professional army and volunteers in
cases of war, says University of Vermont history professor Mark Stoller.
A draft was most recently in effect from 1940 to 1946 and from 1948 to
1973.
Stoller, who does not voice a position for or against the draft, says
the selective service system the United States had during the Vietnam
War did not treat everyone equally since it allowed deferments for certain
professionals and college students.
"The most egalitarian system is that everybody is drafted or that
everyone gets military training and that they can be called up as needed,"
he says.
Legislators Speak Out
Members of Vermont’s congressional delegation do not support a
return to a draft.
Laurie Schultz Heim, defense adviser to Senator Jim Jeffords says the
senator "sees no reason to depart from a system that works pretty
well."
However, she says the senator believes the armed forces can do more to
broaden the racial and economic background of their recruits, too many
of whom, some observers say, come from poor and minority groups with few
other options to increase their income and education.
Senator Patrick Leahy says the important thing is to support those in
the military.
"The only people making sacrifices are our men and women in uniform
overseas, their families, their friends, and the Iraqi people," Leahy
said in a written statement. "Reinstating the draft might spread
the burden to others, but it wouldn’t necessarily strengthen the
military. It would have broad social consequences."
According to Sanders’ spokesman Joel Barkin, Representative Bernie
Sanders believes the United States should focus on working with the international
community, .
"We’re overextended at this point," Barkin says. "We
think that it’s a global issue to have Iraq be a safe and democratic
country, and the U.S. can’t do it by itself."
A Matter of Choice
Bonnie Benson of Essex Town has three sons, ages 17, 15, and 13. She
says her husband Mark spent 20 years in the Vermont National Guard, so
the boys grew up in a military household. The three are considering military
college.
"I would support them if they went," she says. "I would
be scared, but I would definitely support them."
But Benson says the military is not for everyone. For some, she says,
mandatory service would violate their beliefs and take away some of their
freedom.
"I don’t know that I’d like to see the draft,"
she says. "I think there should be a choice."box:
Selective Service Defined
For information on the draft, see the Selective Service System Web site
at www.sss.gov
A report for the Congressional Research Service published in December
2002 in anticipation of the war in Iraq said the following:
"A review of military manpower levels and potential war scenarios
suggests that only a prolonged war, with major military reverses for U.S.
forces, or new international developments creating the need for substantially
larger armed forces, would result in a military requirement to reinstitute
the draft. …However, there are possible scenarios that might tax
the ability of the armed forces to recruit a sufficient number of volunteers.
One such scenario could combine an Iraqi conflict with other confrontations
(e.g., North Korea). Other scenarios could involve the need for very large
peacetime deployments of U.S. forces (e.g., the possible occupation of
a defeated Iraq) or major demands for domestic deployments based on threatened
or actual terrorist activity."
|